Argh. Ethanol is giving biodiesel a bad name.
Biofuels are MUCH better for the carbon cycle because, where does corn get the carbon in the first place? It pulls CO2 out of the atmosphere! So it actually completes the carbon cycle, using yesterday's pollution to make tomorrow's fuel. That's MUCH better than injecting new carbon into the atmosphere.
Biofuels don't rob from the mouths of humans. Almost all the corn and soy grown in this country goes to feed meat and dairy animals. While meat and dairy is a staple of American food, it's not particularly good for you.
To the original question, I don't know, but I hope to have firsthand experience soon. I do know that biodiesel and SVO have much, much better lubricity than nasty fossil-fuel diesel... lubricity is "lubrication value" to the internals of the fuel injection system. Because of this excellent lubricity, Europe mandates 5% biodiesel in ALL diesel, and Minnesota (up where it's cold) mandates 2% and says up to 5% has no impact on gelling.
http://www.mda.state.mn.us/renewable/biodiesel/faqs.htm
It actually tends to "clean out" built-up crud in the fuel system, so it can cause a rush of dislodged "plaque" to clog the fuel filter. It has been also known to cause problems with already deteriorated rubber hoses, where the "plaque" is the only thing stopping the leaks.
All new diesel engines are certified for 20% biodiesel, and my belief is they'll take 100% just fine. As you know, the older engines are fine with them.